I personally like this perspective because it is decreasing consumption and reliance on meat, but still allowing some flexibility to enjoy it from time to time as well as opportunities to occasionally indulge in your favorite foods without going overboard or feeling deprived. I have tried being a vegetarian in the past (for an 8 month run) and this was fueled for health reasons, yes, but also because of the inhumane killing and treatment of animals. This new way of eating fortifies my beliefs in being green and kind to all things but allows me to indulge occasionally without feeling like my beliefs are being compromised. To me, having meat in my main dish is definitely not a priority and I actually prefer the vegetarian friendly option!
Here is a final thought I'd like to leave you with. I found this sentiment on a google search and it is written by Darryl from the Fuhrman forums (SAD stands for Standard American Diet):
I like to think of being a nutritarian as simply choosing to live in a better food universe than most people. SAD foods taste good, but they do not taste better than nutritarian food. SAD foods are preferred by our society at large because people are habituated to them. They are habituated to them because those are the foods that are marketed. Those are the foods that are marketed because they are very cheap (in price per calorie, not price per nutrient) and easy to ship, store, and prepare. To ensure that people remain habituated, food companies load them up with taste triggers like salt, sugar, and fat. When you change your food universe to nutrient-dense, health-promoting foods, it will probably take a long time to truly recalibrate your tastes until you truly enjoy them just as much, or more. But it will happen. I love my nutritarian food. My SAD-eating friends love their SAD food. The difference is that I get to eat three times more food than they do. And I don't get sick. So why in the world would I eat SAD foods now?
No comments:
Post a Comment